|
By
Felice J. Freyer
3.01.02 12:00
a.m.
PAWTUCKET,
R.I. --
A letter
of support for the Providence Newspaper Guild from the International
Longshoremen's Union became a subject of dispute yesterday at the
Providence Journal's trial on 46 charges of violating labor law.
Journal lawyer
Richard A. Perras sought to use it as evidence that the Guild's
preparations for a reader boycott had hurt the company, but Administrative
Law Judge William G. Kocol would not allow the letter to be admitted.
The exchange
came on the fourth day of the Journal's trial, as Perras finished
his cross-examination of Guild Administrator Tim Schick.
Yesterday afternoon,
Joseph Griffin, a lawyer for the National Labor Relations Board,
began submitting evidence to support the board's complaints concerning
several instances of unilateral changes in working conditions. Griffin's
evidence was frequently challenged as hearsay by the Journal's other
lawyer, Lincoln
D. Almond, the governor's son. The judge frequently agreed with
Almond.
Under questioning
by Perras, Guild Administrator Tim Schick yesterday morning testified
that the Guild had begun planning a consumer boycott to put economic
pressure on the company. But he said the Guild has not yet started
the boycott.
Perras's questioning
pertained to two major charges that the company faces: that the
Journal threatened to reduce its wage offer if the Guild persisted
in the boycott, and that it later did reduce the offer when the
Guild's boycott preparations continued. The NLRB alleges that the
company's actions, communicated in letters to Guild members, constituted
"regressive bargaining," which is illegal.
Perras tried
to enter into evidence a letter that the Guild had received from
the International Longshoremen's Union last summer. The union, which
had been asked to sign cards pledging to cancel their Journal subscriptions
if the Guild called a boycott, took it a step further and said its
members would stop buying the paper right away.
NLRB lawyer
Elizabeth Vorro objected, arguing that the letter was irrelevant
to the case, because the Guild received it several months after
the company withdrew its wage offer.
Perras said
he was trying to establish that the Guild's boycott efforts had
had an economic impact on the Journal.
"Even
if you establish what you want to establish,'' Judge Kocol said,
``what difference does that make?"
"We believe
that actions to bring economic pressure could be responded to by
the other side,'' Perras said.
Kocol sustained
Vorro's objection, and further ruled that any evidence from any
day after the wage offer was withdrawn would not be admitted in
arguments about the "regressive bargaining" charge.
Yesterday afternoon,
Griffin entered into evidence documents related to the NLRB's accusations
that the company made unilateral changes in working conditions,
and questioned Schick about them.
One charge
involves an editorial assistant, Doreen Tracey, who for years had
earned extra money when she prepared lists of high school graduates,
because such work belongs in a higher classification. The Guild
alleges that the company unilaterally changed Tracey's job description
to avoid paying her the differential. Tracey is expected to testify
in this case today or next week.
Another charge
involves the company's decision to eliminate the lobby security
guard in the Fountain Street building, which the Guild contends
is a change in working conditions that must be bargained. Under
questioning by Griffin, who sought to show that the area is unsafe,
Schick testified about crimes he had witnessed in the area, and
one that he read about in the Journal: the robbery on Fountain Street
of a security guard who was carrying Journal company receipts out
of the building.
Other charges
include the Journal's hiring of a company to sell ads for a special
business section, farming out work that Guild contends belongs to
Guild members; the company's failure to pay overtime to Sports Department
workers who were ordered to come in early for a meeting; and the
company's unilateral decision to assign to porters plant-care responsibilities
that were formerly handled by an outside company.
The trial will
resume today at 9 a.m. in Pawtucket City Hall. Brian Jones, a former
Guild Executive Committee member, is expected to testify. Today's
session will end at 1 p.m.
03.04.02
Clarification: On this page, journalontrial.org originally
referred to a company attorney as "Lincoln Almond Jr., the
governor's son." The younger Mr. Almond is Lincoln D. Almond.
His father, Rhode Island's governor, is Lincoln C. Almond.
Daily
reports on the trial will be posted here on www.journalontrial.org.
The Web site also has directions and a map to Pawtucket City Hall,
137 Roosevelt Ave. The trial starts at 11 a.m. on Monday and at
9 a.m. on the other days. Here's how to get there:
From Providence
and points south: Take Rte. 95 north to School Street exit.
Turn left at bottom of ramp onto School Street. Pass Apex on the
left and go through one light (one-way right) to next light, bearing
left. Go to light at Slater Mill and Visitors Center, making a right
onto Roosevelt Avenue. City Hall will be on your right, with parking
on left. Trial is on third floor.
From
Boston and points north: Take Rte. 95 south into Rhode Island.
Take exit 29, Downtown Pawtucket. At end of ramp, merge onto Broadway.
Go about two-tenths of a mile and turn right onto Exchange Street.
Turn left on Roosevelt Avenue. City Hall will be on your left, with
parking on the right. Trial is on the third floor.
Felice
J. Freyer is the Providence Journal's award-winning medical
writer. She joined the paper in 1982 and was assigned to the medical
beat in 1989. A member of the Guild's Executive Committee since
1994, she has taken a leave from the newspaper to cover the trial.
There is
much more information about the dispute at the Guild's main website,
www.riguild.org. E-mail the
Guild at png@riguild.org. The
union's mailing address is: The Providence Newspaper Guild, 270
Westminster St., Providence, RI 02903. Telephone: (401) 421-9466.
FAX: (401) 421-9495.
|